“COASTLANDS, listen to Me in silence, and let the peoples gain new strength; let them come forward, then let them speak; let us come together for judgment.” Isaiah 41:1. The coastlands today, by way of the mainstream media who are warring factions, pass judgment, the truth be damned! The damning of truth however is an illusion because it cannot be damned; for the truth is an entity that speaks of and by itself, and it has already judged, and judges.
The people have gained new strength and are coming forward and speaking, while crying out for justice to “Lock her up.” Among the multitude of criminalities the people assert that Hillary Clinton has committed, one involves the triangulated relationship between:
- Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State of the State Department; and
- Donors to the Clinton Foundation; and
- The Clinton Foundation
This triangulated relationship, visualized, appears like this:
How can tens of millions of people weigh the evidence from a jury box, convene to a jury room, return with a unanimous decision of guilty; while one man, James Comey, the former gatekeeper of the FBI, counterpoint the deliberations of millions with a finding that there’s no crime?
First, Comey’s finding is no longer reliable because he admitted under oath on May 3, 2017, that the F.B.I. and D.O.J. have failed to follow the law in prosecuting cases for the past 50 years.
Second, James Comey’s brother, Peter Comey, was the “Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas” for DLA Piper, who was the law firm that performed the alleged independent audit of the Clinton Foundation; and the independence of the audit is alleged, and not actual, because it was not independent.
The investigation was all in the family and James Comey, as the gatekeeper, was tethered to it with a multitude of inextricable, financial interests. The triangulated relationship is altered severely, as follows:
James Comey is inside of the triangle, denoting his conflict of interest in overseeing the investigation and his admission that the F.B.I. and the D.O.J. had failed to follow the law for 50 years; and despite the foregoing showing the impossibility of delivering a dispassionate finding and recusing himself, Comey surged forward, pronouncing an INVALID finding that no crime had been committed.
James Comey has not therefore, counterpointed the verdict of tens of millions of Americans who have found Hillary Clinton guilty in the “pay to play” triangulation.
Therefore, to substantiate the guilty verdict, points on the triangle must connect the crimes. Let’s begin with the bottom, left point on the triangle that is designated as Hillary Clinton when she was Secretary of State at the State Department. The State Department oversees the sales of commercial arms, in accordance with “22 U.S. Code § 2752 – Coordination with foreign policy” in addition to authorities in presidential executive orders signed over the years.
“Under Clinton’s leadership, the State Department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to 20 nations whose governments have given money to the Clinton Foundation, according to an IBTimes analysis of State Department and foundation data. That figure — derived from the three full fiscal years of Clinton’s term as Secretary of State (from October 2010 to September 2012) — represented nearly double the value of American arms sales made to the those countries and approved by the State Department during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.”
Not surprisingly, there were at least 20 nations who donated to the Clinton Foundation, who were also approved for commercial arms.
The triangulated relationship is now updated as follows:
However, out of the 20 nations that are identified as of this date that donated to the Clinton Foundation and received commercial arms through the State Department, the question must be asked as to whether any or all of them are appropriate, or were any or all of them inappropriate? In accordance with human rights standards, the State Department approved the sales of commercial arms to eight of the 20 nations that engage in discrimination against women, LGBTQ, and children. These eight nations are identified in this two minute and thirty-three second video, courtesy of Fox News:
The eight nations that were approved for and received commercial arms that should not have are as follows:
- Saudi Arabia
- United Arab Emirates
Today, Hillary Clinton’s new organization, Onward Together, incorporates the mantra she’s used in the past:
“Resist, Persist, Insist, Enlist”
This mantra represents opposition against human rights violations, among other nuances. By Hillary Clinton’s iterated passions today and in the past, it’s impossible for her to deny that commercial arms sales to the identified eight nations in violation of human rights should not have received approval from HER State Department.
Why then, did Hillary approve the commercial sales of arms to countries that engage terroristic laws or practices to human rights? Aside from inventing a fantastical answer that tens of millions of Americans will not believe, the answer to the question is that she was paid money from the donors for the State Department approvals of commercial arms.
As Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch, said, “The conflicts of interest are cast in stone.”
There are eight criminal counts that Hillary Clinton committed for a violation of only one law, for each of the eight nations that donated to the Clinton Foundation and received commercial arms. However, more than one law was criminally violated, and for each law that was violated, there are eight additional counts of criminal violations. The criminal triangulated relationships are summarized as follows:
Lock her up!
h/t to @idraintheswamp for research which is available here.